Core Sprint 9 Retrospective

Core Sprint 9 Retrospective

 

Date

Jan 29, 2018

Participants

@Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed)@Michael Stay (Unlicensed) (invited), @Yaraslau Levashkevich@Chris Kirkwood-Watts (invited), @Jeremy Busk@Henry Till

 

Retrospective

 

What did we do well?

 

What should we have done better?

  • Henry Till: There was a lot of information to go through.  We are now getting to a point where there is some cruft that needs to be pruned.  How much is still accurate?

  • Jeremy Busk: Some of the architecture documentation is out of date.  It's confusing.   We need to update the architecture documentation. 

  • Yaraslau Levashkevich: If we had started with Path-To-Regex work first (CORE-109), instead of CORE-110 (which had higher priority at sprint start), it would have been better.

 

Actions

@Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed): meet with Jeremy on his sprint plan.
@Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed): Need to press the team on maintaining the documentation.  Henry to update the legacy storage spec to indicate that it is old.