/
Core Sprint 9 Retrospective
Core Sprint 9 Retrospective
Retrospective
What did we do well?
- Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed): Henry reimplemented storage. Nice.
- Henry Till: Yaraslau's regex code looks really clean.
- Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed): Chris got the Docker images built and documented for the release, along with some utility added.
What should we have done better?
- Henry Till: There was a lot of information to go through. We are now getting to a point where there is some cruft that needs to be pruned. How much is still accurate?
- Jeremy Busk: Some of the architecture documentation is out of date. It's confusing. We need to update the architecture documentation.
- Yaraslau Levashkevich: If we had started with Path-To-Regex work first (CORE-109), instead of CORE-110 (which had higher priority at sprint start), it would have been better.
Actions
- Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed): meet with Jeremy on his sprint plan.
- Medha Parlikar (Unlicensed): Need to press the team on maintaining the documentation. Henry to update the legacy storage spec to indicate that it is old.
, multiple selections available,
Related content
Core Sprint 10 Retrospective
Core Sprint 10 Retrospective
More like this
2018-06-04 Core sprint 9 retrospective
2018-06-04 Core sprint 9 retrospective
More like this
Core Sprint 8 Retrospective
Core Sprint 8 Retrospective
More like this
Core Sprint 14 Retrospective
Core Sprint 14 Retrospective
More like this
Core Sprint 11 Retrospective
Core Sprint 11 Retrospective
More like this
Core Sprint 12 Retrospective
Core Sprint 12 Retrospective
More like this