...
- Is it too much of a security risk to allow validators to pick their own regions?
- What will be used as cryptographic evidence for various performance requirements (or performance failures)?
- Is it a good idea to give the tokens from a valid slash to the accuser?
- On the one hand it gives an economic incentive to slash other validators
- But on the other hand it gives an unbonding backdoor. A pair of validators could have an agreement that one slashes the other then returns the stake, allowing an unbond which circumvents the holding period.
- What to do with tokens deducted due to failed slash?
- At what rate are new tokens minted in validator rewards? How does this minting interact with the blessed Rev mint contract (which can only exist in a single namespace)?